Selekt and Aftershoot solve different versions of the culling problem. Aftershoot can generate an automated or assisted first pass; Selekt keeps the creative selection manual and adds local quality signals and related-frame groups. We make Selekt, so treat this as a framework for a trial rather than an independent product test.

Where Aftershoot fits

Aftershoot is the clearer candidate when you want software to propose selections, detect duplicates and key faces, and combine culling with optional editing tools. Its official material says culling runs locally and can work offline after installation. Current Select pricing is US$10 per month billed annually or US$15 month to month, with unlimited processing and a 30-day trial. Verify the current plan page because bundles and promotions change.

Where Selekt fits

Selekt is the clearer candidate when you want to see and decide on every keeper yourself. The free plan includes unlimited culling, local focus/exposure/blur signals, and burst, similar-frame, and near-duplicate grouping. Optional cloud analysis has a separate allowance of 100 analyses per month on Free. This comparison focuses on the desktop workflow.

Run a fair comparison

Copy one representative RAW job into both products. Record import and preview time, the number of automated suggestions you reverse, missed required moments, burst-comparison effort, export fidelity, offline behaviour, and total active time. Audit every proposed reject before deleting files. Do not infer quality from architecture labels or vendor accuracy percentages; your camera formats, hardware, and coverage obligations determine the useful result.

Which should you choose?

Choose Aftershoot when an AI-proposed first pass reduces your total work after review. Choose Selekt when manual editorial control, local technical aids, and a free unlimited cull are the better fit. Keep your current editor when neither trial improves the complete import-to-edit handoff. Compare the recurring price in your currency immediately before subscribing.

Sources and further reading